{"id":1692,"date":"2017-07-31T15:23:13","date_gmt":"2017-07-31T19:23:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lawflog.com\/?p=1692"},"modified":"2017-07-31T16:48:43","modified_gmt":"2017-07-31T20:48:43","slug":"hillary-clintons-lawyers-may-yet-face-justice-for-destroying-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawflog.com\/?p=1692","title":{"rendered":"Hillary Clinton’s lawyers may yet face justice for destroying evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>A lawsuit that seeks to force the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission to investigate Hillary Clinton’s lawyers will\u00a0not<\/span><\/span><\/u>\u00a0be dismissed, according to an order that I received today, and those lawyers may yet have to answer for destroying thousands of emails.<\/p>\n

In a long footnote, Anne Arundel Circuit Judge Ronald A. Silkworth rejected the rationale of Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh, an ardent Clinton supporter, to dismiss the case on its face.* That means bar prosecutors will have to explain themselves, and they may have to turn over documents and answer questions under oath.<\/p>\n

Frankly, I’m surprised. I’ve previously written about how the Arkansas Bar buried my complaint against Mrs. Clinton<\/a>, and how the D.C. Bar buried my complaint against<\/a> David Kendall, Cheryl Mills, and Heather Samuelson<\/a>, i.e.<\/em>, the same lawyers I complained about in Maryland. It looks like Maryland is going a different direction.<\/p>\n

Normally I’d include more detail in my post, but a friend died unexpectedly yesterday and I don’t particularly feel like blogging. \u00a0Feel free to post your own analysis in the comments section below.<\/p>\n

\n

* I did not post the order because the case has been sealed.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>