The FBI is hiding documents about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich, according to emails released last week, so this morning I requested a criminal investigation into the cover-up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As most people outside of solitary confinement know, the whole “Russian collusion” investigation began with the premise that Russia hacked the DNC, but considerable evidence suggests that the DNC emails were downloaded by someone inside the DNC — liike Mr. Rich — and then provided to Wikileaks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rather than re-invent the wheel, I’ve copied and pasted my letter to U.S. Attorney John Durham<\/a>, U.S. Attorney Richard Donoghue, and Inspector General Michael Horowitz:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mr. Durham, Mr. Donoghue and Mr. Horowitz:<\/p> I wish to file a criminal complaint regarding false statements made by FBI Section Chief David M. Hardy in two affidavits [click here<\/a> and here<\/a>] filed in the FOIA case identified above [i.e.<\/em>, Ty Clevenger v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al.<\/em>, Civil Action No. 18-CV-01568]. I requested FBI records pertaining to Seth Rich, who allegedly was the source of Democratic National Committee emails published by Wikileaks in 2016 (rather than Russian hackers). In the affidavits (attached to the email version of this letter), Mr. Hardy testified that his office conducted a reasonable search, and it found no responsive records. <\/p> New evidence proves otherwise, and it appears that Mr. Hardy has perpetrated a fraud on the court. Judicial Watch recently published documents that it obtained in response to a FOIA request for communications between former FBI agent Peter Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa Page (https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/JW-v-DOJ-Strzok-Page-Prod-16-00154.pdf<\/a>), and I would direct your attention to pages 123-125. In those pages, you will find a heavily-redacted email discussion regarding Mr. Rich. Note that the header on those emails is \u201cSeth Rich.\u201d<\/p> I defy Mr. Hardy to provide an innocent explanation for his office\u2019s failure to produce these emails, and I suspect the misconduct reaches far beyond my specific FOIA request. Several facts are worth noting:<\/p> * Mr. Hardy touts the reasonableness of relying on the FBI\u2019s Central Records System (\u201cCRS\u201d), but note that CRS does not search the FBI email system. That sort of half-baked, designed-to-fail search methodology would never be tolerated in litigation among private parties, yet it appears to be standard operating procedure at the FBI. And note that when I asked the FBI to search its email systems, it arbitrarily refused.<\/p> * Mr. Hardy\u2019s staff purportedly searched for \u201cSeth Conrad Rich\u201d but failed to search for \u201cSeth Rich,\u201d another tactic designed to exclude responsive records.<\/p> * According to Mr. Hardy\u2019s affidavit, the only records indexed by CRS are those that are manually designated by FBI personnel. Undoubtedly, FBI personnel know that they can immunize their email communications from FOIA requests simply by omitting the subject matter from the CRS, because Mr. Hardy will subsequently declare (1) that a CRS search is sufficient and (2) there is no need to conduct an email search.<\/p> I have previously written to Mr. Durham regarding evidence that the FBI was hiding information about Mr. Rich, and I have attached a December 13, 2019 order<\/a> issued in Butowsky v. Folkenflik<\/em>, Case No. 4:18-cv-00442-ALM-CMC (E.D. Tex.). Please see pages 23-29 in particular. Finally, I have attached an October 8, 2019 reply<\/a> in the FOIA case, and it notes a previous occasion wherein Mr. Hardy provided inaccurate information to a court.<\/p> It appears that FBI personnel are deliberately hiding records about Seth Rich and deliberately deceiving the court about the reasonableness of their searches for those records. Worse, this sort of bad-faith non-compliance appears to be the norm.<\/p> I request that your respective offices investigate to determine whether responsive information has been withheld intentionally, and whether Mr. Hardy knowingly submitted false affidavits to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.<\/p> Thank you for your consideration.<\/p> \/s\/ Ty Clevenger<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n CORRECTION: According to Mr. Hardy’s affidavit, a search for “Seth Conrad Rich” would have turned up records for “Seth Rich.”<\/span><\/p>\nShare this:<\/h3>