{"id":2304,"date":"2020-01-29T15:57:20","date_gmt":"2020-01-29T19:57:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lawflog.com\/?p=2304"},"modified":"2020-01-29T16:03:46","modified_gmt":"2020-01-29T20:03:46","slug":"fbi-doubles-down-on-seth-rich-cover-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawflog.com\/?p=2304","title":{"rendered":"FBI doubles down on Seth Rich cover-up"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

When you get caught with your pants down, just deny the obvious. That appears to be the strategy of the FBI, according to a letter I received from this afternoon from the Justice Department.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The letter from Asst. U.S. Attorney Kathleen Mahoney maintains — despite clear documentary proof to the contrary — that the FBI conducted a “reasonable search” for records about Seth Rich, the murdered Democratic National Committee employee who (rather than Russian hackers) is alleged to have leaked DNC emails to Wikileaks. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since your humble correspondent still works a day job (with lots of deadlines), I’ll let you read the letter addressed to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom and analyze it for yourself. Just click here<\/a> for the letter, and click here<\/a> for the exhibits to the letter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Incidentally, I asked Judicial Watch to provide a declaration authenticating that it received the emails cited above in response to a FOIA request to the FBI, and Judicial Watch refused. What is that about? I needed the declaration so I could submit the emails as evidence in court (although Ms. Mahoney’s letter obviates that need).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In my experience, Judicial Watch likes to hog the spotlight (specifically the Fox News studio cameras) and often does not play well with others. That’s unfortunate, because those of us seeking the truth should be working together. And it’s not like I’m a threat to JW’s multi-million dollar fundraising operation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>